Well, today's appt with the audiologist was exceptionally disappointing. When I brought up TransEar, the senior audiologist told me that:
- it's not new, it's been around since the 80s, now it's just new marketing
- didn't work well then, doesn't work now
- everyone who tries it finds it uncomfortable and doesn't use it past the first couple of months
- "you don't want that"
I tried to explain that I had talked with several people who use TransEar and are very happy with it. I tried to suggest that perhaps the technology has changed in the last 20 years. (Ya think!!!) I tried to explain that I don't expect a return to full speech discrimination or localization. I just want to be better aware of when something's happening on my deaf side.
I was shut down again. She obviously thought she knew my needs better than I do. At that point, I stopped. Clearly she wasn't going to be willing to work with me on this, so I figured I'm better off finding someone else who is. I did get a chance to try out some other hearing aids to see what they're like. I didn't like the cros one at all - not only did I not like having something in my good ear, but the sound quality seemed very unnatural. I also tried a regular digital hearing aid in my good ear to compensate for my low frequency loss there - it made a difference and the sound quality was excellent, but I'm not sure I'd get $2200 worth of benefit.
I was so frustrated. Is it so unreasonable to expect that the hearing aid clinic at a world-renowned facility would be willing to have an open dialog about this?
On to find better people, I guess.
Katie