Author Topic: Radiosurgery options and machine comparisons  (Read 2757 times)

Mark

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
Radiosurgery options and machine comparisons
« on: July 30, 2005, 10:51:01 pm »
For those that are interested:

 The attached link to the CK Society web site provides a very clear and thorough discussion of Radiosurgery, one shot vs FSR and a comparison of all existing machine technologies.

http://www.cksociety.org/PatientInfo/radiosurgery_stereotactic_technology_comparisons.asp

Hope this is helpful

Mark
CK for a 2 cm AN with Dr. Chang/ Dr. Gibbs at Stanford
November 2001

russ

  • Guest
Re: Radiosurgery options and machine comparisons
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2005, 12:27:31 pm »
  "One shot" is a misnomer. Fot GK, there are 201. others, more.
  Gamma rays whether produced by a cobalt cource or Linear Accelerator are not exactly benign little creatures. They can do damage. So can surgery.
  Russ

jamie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Radiosurgery options and machine comparisons
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2005, 01:44:05 pm »
  "One shot" is a misnomer. Fot GK, there are 201. others, more.
  Gamma rays whether produced by a cobalt cource or Linear Accelerator are not exactly benign little creatures. They can do damage. So can surgery.
  Russ

Not to nitpick, but linear accelerators produce x-rays, not gamma rays. But both are forms electromagnetic radiation and have the same effect on tissue. They can do damage and that's why they're useful, to damage the tumor cells. As you said, both treatments can cause nerve damage, the difference being in the likelyhood. What is meant by "one shot", is one treatment in one day. 
CyberKnife radiosurgery at Barrow Neurological Institute; 2.3 cm lower cranial nerve schwannoma