ANA Discussion Forum
Treatment Options => Radiation / Radiosurgery => Topic started by: jb on May 05, 2010, 11:28:37 pm
-
Hi all,
I got this article via Google alerts, so just thought I'd pass it along. They used GK and don't give a lot of details about the size of AN's treated (except that they're "large"). Results look encouraging, although patients with smaller tumors still fare better on average.
http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20100504006497&newsLang=en (http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20100504006497&newsLang=en)
-
Wow thanks for sharing Liz
-
JB ~
Interesting and because it's from the prestigious Mayo Clinic, carries a lot of weight. I'd like to know exactly what size the 'large' ANs were but a 85% rate of success (no re-growth) is definitely attention-grabbing.
Thanks for passing this along.
Jim
-
I also agree that it is a good article. The one exception is that it does not clarify after 5 years why hearing went down. Dr. Jackler of Stanford has told me that folks start losing hearing after 5 years because the cochlea does not handle radiation well. I just wish someone would do a study on just that. I mean you're between a rock and a hard place. Let the tumor grow and lose hearing, have radiation and lose hearing.
TJ
-
JB,
Appreciate you sharing this and it is worth following up. I am interested to know the details behind that study - key stats etc are important when releasing that type of info. You have to be careful with statistics coz they can be manipulated. Nonetheless - it does sound very good.
laz