General Category > AN Issues
MORE CONFUSED THAN EVER!
Willbur:
54 is a little up there. I would watch and wait since it is so small.
Sheba:
last year I decided to have a 1.4cm AN removed, rather than wait and watch. It seems like results of surgery are better when the tumors are not too big. I am 54. My decision was also influenced by feeling my insurance is good now, and I don't know how it might be down the road; and same for my overall health. I have no regrets, went to Dr F @ Keck and had great outcome.
many people are able to W&W for long time, many tumors are not actively growing when discovered. but it sounds like yours is growing based on the two MRIs in last few years.
middle fossa, especially w/ the docs at keck or house, has very good stats for saving hearing at its current level, but it's not a guarantee. if you w&w you can also continue losing hearing.
I had hoped they could save my hearing (retrosig surgery) but I did lose it. In busy places, it can be a challenge but most of the time, I just sit or stand where my good ear is getting the sound. I may go for a hearing aid (BAHA / Oticon), will decide that later this year.
Tobeycat1134:
Thank you Sheba. I have scheduled my surgery with Dr. Slattery and Dr. Schwartz at House for June 22nd. Why did they choose to do retrosig instead of middle fossa. Just curious. Willbur, I remember at 30 thinking 52 was a little up there; it's not the same when you are 52 though.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version